Not about what I say, though. Could quite understand that. Free speech and all that.
But no, it's usually trivia.
Last time I was on GMTV, it was my weight that came in for the evils.
This time, a very brief Sky News appearance, it's poor old Oscar's grooming and the untidyness of the Dogs Today office that have come in for much scorn. For some reason I let him/her get away with this one...
"Saw your interviewon Sky News, not sure which worse the messy office or the Beardie that look like it needed good groom."
But I drew the line at this one... until now....
" 'beardies are a lot of work and not everyone has time to keep them properly groomed.' so where is the line between neglect and not being properly groomed? I have often seen the dog used as a "prop" in interviews and photos and would have to admit compared to the clean and well groomed dogs I have seen in the show ring, it does seem that the "evils of the show ring" message Dogs Today keeps on peddling which may have better life"
and this delightfully worded one came in after I rejected the one above....
"In the pink re you view on office shambles....not being able to organise a cocktail party in an oflicence or a similar one regarding brewery comes to mind, the author of this blog criticised the person who edited the report and yet they too are not the most efficient editor as their track record of shambolic slip ups have shown in the past so working in a mess is reflection of their own lack of ability and to comment on such is fair thing to do "
For those who blinked and missed it, here are some stills so you can make up your mind whether we need the RSPCA around or indeed Aggie and whatever the other one's name is and the bleach!
In future I will be banning trivial anonymous personal comments as they really are a waste of everyone's time! After all, I could have had the Mr Sheen out and the comb in the time it took me to write this!