May 2014 edition of Dogs Today

May 2014 edition of Dogs Today
May 2014 edition of Dogs Today

Friday, 13 August 2010

Police sieze family pet - then lose her!

Just been asked to put this on the blog, how very upsetting on every level...

A Hertfordshire family have been left devastated after police seized their much loved family pet …and then lost her.

Tootsie, an 18 month old Staffie cross was seized on Tuesday morning after police acted on a warrant believing that Tootsies was a “pit bull type”. As the law allows, Tootsie was seized and taken to a secret location to await an examination to determine if she fitted the standard used for a banned breed. However Tootsies owner Mikala Coulthard received a telephone call later that day to say that when they went to check on Tootsie she was missing leaving her family heartbroken.

Mikala says “We have been trying to get some information from the police but they will not disclose any information as to what area she was taken to or escaped from! I understand the need for not disclosing where the kennels are but how can we look for her when we don’t know where to look? All they keep saying is she must have jumped a 6.5 fence and that they have officers out looking for her.
 
Tootsie is a family pet and has never been in any trouble before. She lives with children who keep asking when shes coming home and another dog who is pining for her.

Tootsie is friendly with people and dogs and we are worried that it’s been nearly three days now. She will be cold, tired and hungry and we beg anyone to please call if they see her. It may be someone has taken her into their home and we would ask those people to please contact the police on 0845 33 00 222 so we can get our baby back!”
 

3 comments:

Mandy said...

How absolutely terrible for the family and for Tootsie - when will this madness stop? Surely the police can come up with a better way of dealing with suspected pit-bull types - leaving them in their homes but stipulating that they be muzzled and kept on lead when taken out in public until an expert has been to see the dog, for example? (even better of course if they rehashed the whole dangerous dogs act fiasco and looked at deed not breed)

Anonymous said...

determine if she fitted the standard used for a banned breed ............. what is the standard and who decides they fit it?

Anonymous said...

was she microchipped?